One cheap debate trick is reframing opposing opinions as having some sort of 'moral failure' and therefore foregoing all rights. For example, lots of attempts to shut down 'open debate' do so by framing the opposing opinions not as wrong, but as as "interruptive"
-
-
Homosexuality is cureable therefore take the cure and stop and existing as a homosexual. If you just ate enough potatoes you'd eventually realise you were a potato lover all along. There's more than one way of removing those you consider undesirable
-
making someone gay not-gay is not the same thing of "removing them," it's "changing them." If I hate potatoeaters and I try to make them stop eatin potatos am I "removing the undesirable?" Idk why pressures to change behavior suddenly get this new class if they're about lgbtq
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.