One cheap debate trick is reframing opposing opinions as having some sort of 'moral failure' and therefore foregoing all rights. For example, lots of attempts to shut down 'open debate' do so by framing the opposing opinions not as wrong, but as as "interruptive"
-
-
That’s wonderful but not relevant. There is a difference between engaging an individual with a poorly reasoned set of world views and giving a platform to someone who is not going to be reasoned with and does not care about the truth (Such as Richard Spencer)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Highly recommend this two parter, succinctly explains the position https://youtu.be/GGTDhutW_us
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.