"Oh, what a nice melody you have there. It would be a shame if someone.... /made it a droning repetition/"
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The traditional DJ is like a gallery curator: they play other people's music and let it speak for themselves. They enhance the music through context. DJ-as-remixer (beyond mere structural changes) is an aberration (to a degree).
-
but it doesn't feel like an enhancement, it strips away the most important part of a song that makes it good - the melody - and replaces it with UNGH U UNGH U UNGH. there are SO MANY MEASURES without any change.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
It's hit or miss whether covers or remixes are better than original. It's hit or miss whether anything is good. Sorting through trash to find gems is normal operating procedure for life.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The same goes for almost all covers - playing slow and sad isn't arty it's just boring.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Nope. I have almost no use for a DJ. They are all certain they can do better. So far, they've all been wrong.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No. I tell them.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Personally, i dont care for DJ's. They think they're better at creating than the original artist. I also find it funny so many use DJ in their name like its something to be honored instead of a job.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.