According to my article here about "types of dating relationships": aellagirl.com/2017/10/21/dat
You would consider yourself to prefer more ______-style relationships
Conversation
Replying to
Article short version: Accordions are easy to play. You can focus on making "good music" with them, forget about the instrument.
Sitars are hard to play. You remain engaged with the instrument, its not easy to make "good music", it's hard to forget about the instrument.
1
1
Accordion relationships are people who are easy to date, with the goal of a "good relationship."
Sitar relationships are people who are difficult to date, where the focus is more on working with the person, and "good relationship" being a secondary goal.
1
1
2
Accordion relationships value being frictionless and easy. Sitar relationships get value out of having friction and challenge.
2
1
Replying to
I'll be honest, i didn't read the article but i will start reading it now after reading a bit of it over the top since it seems interesting. I would rather have a high/high type of relationship; both partners need to give, and for that you must also take. Always building.
1
Replying to
The thing is that no person is just a Sitar or an Accordion. This dialectic is too reductive. I've been with people who were A, but would turn into S over some subjects or some times.