Why would I?
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The only reason to give EVERYONE herpes would be so they all experience the symptoms, to destigmatize it. Otherwise, what's the point?
-
Why destigmatize having an infectious disease?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Not having symptoms yourself doesn't mean you can't infect someone else, who might suffer symptoms.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think we are interpreting the question very differently. I took it to mean that everyone at the time is infected/carrying the virus...
-
...which means that everyone born afterwards is now susceptible to infection without the same asymptomatic condition applied.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If it asked if I would vaccinate everyone from herpes with 100% efficacy, that's a different question, and I'd have said yes.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Does it automatically replace symptomatic herpes?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not having symptoms != being immune. Carrying an infectious disease that doesn't affect YOU is not the same thing as not having it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think ambiguity in the question leads more to confusion than insight, as people try to figure out the "rules" of the poll.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.