body { -ms-overflow-style: scrollbar; overflow-y: scroll; overscroll-behavior-y: none; } .errorContainer { background-color: #FFF; color: #0F1419; max-width: 600px; margin: 0 auto; padding: 10%; font-family: Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; } .errorButton { margin: 3em 0; } .errorButton a { background: #1DA1F2; border-radius: 2.5em; color: white; padding: 1em 2em; text-decoration: none; } .errorButton a:hover, .errorButton a:focus { background: rgb(26, 145, 218); } .errorFooter { color: #657786; font-size: 80%; line-height: 1.5; padding: 1em 0; } .errorFooter a, .errorFooter a:visited { color: #657786; text-decoration: none; padding-right: 1em; } .errorFooter a:hover, .errorFooter a:active { text-decoration: underline; } #placeholder, #react-root { display: none !important; } body { background-color: #FFF !important; }

JavaScript is not available.

We’ve detected that JavaScript is disabled in this browser. Please enable JavaScript or switch to a supported browser to continue using twitter.com. You can see a list of supported browsers in our Help Center.

Terms of Service Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Imprint Ads info © 2023 Twitter, Inc.

Conversation

Would you support a system where person's vote was weighted by their average score of testing for several different types of intelligence?

Strongly yes
22.9%
Slightly yes
30.5%
Slightly no
14.2%
Strongly no
32.4%

1,058 votesFinal results

9:09 PM · Jul 13, 2017

This Tweet is from a suspended account. Learn more

Replying to

I sort of agree, but every time I say straight up 'IQ' ppl complain at me

1

Replying to

The system would become corrupted by the people it gave preference to, and the people it gave preference to wd be corrupted by the system.

antivanquishable

@omnitriumphant

Replying to

The Thinning , , youtube.com/watch?v=XD3M5J

@pNauticExpress

Replying to

I see that 38% of the people who took this poll are strongly stupid

1

Replying to

As opposed to being strongly weighted by size of their pocketbook ? Sounds like an improvement to me

Dr. Poop Muscles, PhD

Replying to

It's a good thing there are no selfish & malevolent intelligent people in this world.

Replying to

Of course what we now need to know is how smart the people who voted for each answer are :)