body { -ms-overflow-style: scrollbar; overflow-y: scroll; overscroll-behavior-y: none; } .errorContainer { background-color: #FFF; color: #0F1419; max-width: 600px; margin: 0 auto; padding: 10%; font-family: Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; } .errorButton { margin: 3em 0; } .errorButton a { background: #1DA1F2; border-radius: 2.5em; color: white; padding: 1em 2em; text-decoration: none; } .errorButton a:hover, .errorButton a:focus { background: rgb(26, 145, 218); } .errorFooter { color: #657786; font-size: 80%; line-height: 1.5; padding: 1em 0; } .errorFooter a, .errorFooter a:visited { color: #657786; text-decoration: none; padding-right: 1em; } .errorFooter a:hover, .errorFooter a:active { text-decoration: underline; } #placeholder, #react-root { display: none !important; } body { background-color: #FFF !important; }

JavaScript is not available.

We’ve detected that JavaScript is disabled in this browser. Please enable JavaScript or switch to a supported browser to continue using twitter.com. You can see a list of supported browsers in our Help Center.

Terms of Service Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Imprint Ads info © 2023 Twitter, Inc.

Conversation

Would you feel morally ok if we made an advanced female AI in a robot body programmed to LOVE total sluttiness and sex?

Yes, strongly
49.1%
Yes, slightly
32%
No, slightly
11.2%
No, strongly
7.6%

812 votesFinal results

7:02 PM · Jul 7, 2017

Replying to

sorry, *advanced AI in a female robot body

3

Typically°írrëgÜlãr ( ͡ʘ ͜ʖ ͡ʘ)

Replying to

If? Pretty sure they already have.

PanDeism: An Anthology

Replying to

Yes, and the same for a male AI programmed the same.

Notional Jacques

Replying to

I mean...would they have any personality apart from "slutty"? If not, we wouldn't have much to relate about. I'd prefer a human being.