....but surely one can lay out all theological possibilities, and make logically valid determinations about their relative probability, with
-
-
Replying to @Pandeism
probability is deeply subjective, as it is a calculation dependent on perspective, 'logically valid probability prediction is nonsensical
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Aella_Girl
May I ask, how would you describe yourself now in terms of religion and/or spirituality?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Pandeism
Loosely into zen, or basically whatever the things zen says sounds real good to me
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @Aella_Girl
I do like that as well. Meditate, and let go. A reasonable way to live.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Pandeism
more fundamentally, it is the 'falsity of all belief' to understand what role belief plays in relation to the self
3 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @Aella_Girl
I tend to teeter very quickly from that into the possibility that nothing is true at all (simulation theory; brain in a jar; etc)....
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Pandeism
if you have an 'idea' to replace it - a simulation, a jar, etc., then you are not escaping from belief, you are operating within it
3 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @Aella_Girl
I realize that this is self-serving to the sense of desire to know, but doesn't such a sense of desire raise the possibility that there....
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Pandeism @Aella_Girl
....is some kind of *something* which has (or even is defined by) such a want to know? In, even, the Eriugenian becoming-to-know sense?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.