Aella@Aella_Girlwould you agree with the claim "explicit consent is just a guideline; if no harm is done, then explicit consent isn't always needed"?Strongly agree11.9%Slightly agree29.7%Slightly disagree23.3%Strongly disagree35.2%455 votes·Final results6:20 PM · Feb 17, 20173 Likes
Dr. Poop Muscles, PhD@Space_Boy_Ben·Feb 17, 2017Replying to @Aella_Girlfor my end of things what it comes down to is "How well do we know each other? Do we have a long enough history of intimacy?"13
Lost in a Classist Society@lsthart·Feb 17, 2017Replying to @Aella_Girlit really depends on the action... Say someone wanks over your sleeping body...no harm was done...but it's kinda sketch.
MrShepard@Mr_Shepard·Feb 17, 2017Replying to @Aella_GirlIn what context is the "explicit consent"? I know theres sexual consent, and then theres written consent for legal things.1
Lost in a Classist Society@lsthart·Feb 17, 2017Replying to @Aella_Girlif you are talking about sex though, which most probably would assume, rarely do both parties give explicit consent.1