I'm not sure I wholly agree with "obligation" but it definitely has a strong interest in doing so given the lack of alternatives
-
-
-
no matter how many Christian fundies come to power abstinence only education isn't going to curb unwanted pregnancy or STIs.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I believe the government is obliged to ensure health care is available to all citizens, & I gather PP is effective.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
should read taxpayer
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
yes, but only because they fund other health service providers that provide the same services EXCEPT for the abortion thing.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Since women are 100% responsible for decision to have a child. They should be 100% responsible for care and raising of child.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If you provide adequate education about sex and sexuality you don't need to fund Planned Parenthood. But the US doesn't do that.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The government doesn't fund any other medical procedure, so I don't think so. They can if they choose to though.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
abortion and reproductive services generally, yeah, planned parenthood specifically, I'm not sure. Who owns it
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No obligation, but self-interest as state.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.