body { -ms-overflow-style: scrollbar; overflow-y: scroll; overscroll-behavior-y: none; } .errorContainer { background-color: #FFF; color: #0F1419; max-width: 600px; margin: 0 auto; padding: 10%; font-family: Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; } .errorButton { margin: 3em 0; } .errorButton a { background: #1DA1F2; border-radius: 2.5em; color: white; padding: 1em 2em; text-decoration: none; } .errorButton a:hover, .errorButton a:focus { background: rgb(26, 145, 218); } .errorFooter { color: #657786; font-size: 80%; line-height: 1.5; padding: 1em 0; } .errorFooter a, .errorFooter a:visited { color: #657786; text-decoration: none; padding-right: 1em; } .errorFooter a:hover, .errorFooter a:active { text-decoration: underline; } #placeholder, #react-root { display: none !important; } body { background-color: #FFF !important; }

JavaScript is not available.

We’ve detected that JavaScript is disabled in this browser. Please enable JavaScript or switch to a supported browser to continue using twitter.com. You can see a list of supported browsers in our Help Center.

Terms of Service Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Imprint Ads info © 2023 Twitter, Inc.

Conversation

Is consent for a dangerous thing invalid if you have a strong incentive to agree to that consent? (eg, I'll give you 1 mil to punch you)

Yes
32.2%
No
67.8%

469 votesFinal results

11:29 PM · Oct 9, 2016

Replying to

in highschool we used to play who can punch the softest, id hit first and hard and say yay you won :|

Replying to

as long as you can freely refuse the incentive without consequences, no

1

Replying to

i voted no, but it would be incase of someone holding a gun to your head.

Replying to

no. Because you're still weighing the options and consenting. If it were let me punch you or I'll shoot you then it wouldn't