body { -ms-overflow-style: scrollbar; overflow-y: scroll; overscroll-behavior-y: none; } .errorContainer { background-color: #FFF; color: #0F1419; max-width: 600px; margin: 0 auto; padding: 10%; font-family: Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; } .errorButton { margin: 3em 0; } .errorButton a { background: #1DA1F2; border-radius: 2.5em; color: white; padding: 1em 2em; text-decoration: none; } .errorButton a:hover, .errorButton a:focus { background: rgb(26, 145, 218); } .errorFooter { color: #657786; font-size: 80%; line-height: 1.5; padding: 1em 0; } .errorFooter a, .errorFooter a:visited { color: #657786; text-decoration: none; padding-right: 1em; } .errorFooter a:hover, .errorFooter a:active { text-decoration: underline; } #placeholder, #react-root { display: none !important; } body { background-color: #FFF !important; }

JavaScript is not available.

We’ve detected that JavaScript is disabled in this browser. Please enable JavaScript or switch to a supported browser to continue using twitter.com. You can see a list of supported browsers in our Help Center.

Terms of Service Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Imprint Ads info © 2023 Twitter, Inc.

Conversation

i don't think it's possible to be both poetic and precisely analytical. I'm looking at you, every classic philosopher ever

7:08 PM · Sep 8, 2016

Replying to

Poetically analytical?

Replying to

I agree

Dr. Poop Muscles, PhD

Replying to

"Nothingness haunts being."

Replying to

Naturally. That's why art and science are different magisteria. But we don't all want to read dry analytical texts. We are Human

@boredsillydroid

Replying to

Precisely.

NYC (Feb22–Mar13)

Replying to

@RichardAbowitz

and

also Carl Sagan