body { -ms-overflow-style: scrollbar; overflow-y: scroll; overscroll-behavior-y: none; } .errorContainer { background-color: #FFF; color: #0F1419; max-width: 600px; margin: 0 auto; padding: 10%; font-family: Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; } .errorButton { margin: 3em 0; } .errorButton a { background: #1DA1F2; border-radius: 2.5em; color: white; padding: 1em 2em; text-decoration: none; } .errorButton a:hover, .errorButton a:focus { background: rgb(26, 145, 218); } .errorFooter { color: #657786; font-size: 80%; line-height: 1.5; padding: 1em 0; } .errorFooter a, .errorFooter a:visited { color: #657786; text-decoration: none; padding-right: 1em; } .errorFooter a:hover, .errorFooter a:active { text-decoration: underline; } #placeholder, #react-root { display: none !important; } body { background-color: #FFF !important; }

JavaScript is not available.

We’ve detected that JavaScript is disabled in this browser. Please enable JavaScript or switch to a supported browser to continue using twitter.com. You can see a list of supported browsers in our Help Center.

Terms of Service Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Imprint Ads info © 2023 Twitter, Inc.

Conversation

If you had the option of working for 3 days to save the life of a child, are you morally obligated to do so?

Yes
46.2%
No
53.8%

563 votesFinal results

7:00 PM · Aug 19, 2016

Vaelin Van Gogh

Replying to

There are philosophers who claim once your basic needs are met then it is immoral to spend your time/money on anything else.

Replying to

depends what you learn from the experience.

@KarlCarter2015

Replying to

no

Dr. Poop Muscles, PhD

Replying to

considering the Kantian notions of so called "moral obligations" preclude a necessity for them needing to arise authentically...

1

Tabor Tollefson

@TaborTollefson

Replying to

It is the morally right thing to do but morals don't obligate us to act.