body { -ms-overflow-style: scrollbar; overflow-y: scroll; overscroll-behavior-y: none; } .errorContainer { background-color: #FFF; color: #0F1419; max-width: 600px; margin: 0 auto; padding: 10%; font-family: Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; } .errorButton { margin: 3em 0; } .errorButton a { background: #1DA1F2; border-radius: 2.5em; color: white; padding: 1em 2em; text-decoration: none; } .errorButton a:hover, .errorButton a:focus { background: rgb(26, 145, 218); } .errorFooter { color: #657786; font-size: 80%; line-height: 1.5; padding: 1em 0; } .errorFooter a, .errorFooter a:visited { color: #657786; text-decoration: none; padding-right: 1em; } .errorFooter a:hover, .errorFooter a:active { text-decoration: underline; } #placeholder, #react-root { display: none !important; } body { background-color: #FFF !important; }

JavaScript is not available.

We’ve detected that JavaScript is disabled in this browser. Please enable JavaScript or switch to a supported browser to continue using twitter.com. You can see a list of supported browsers in our Help Center.

Terms of Service Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Imprint Ads info © 2023 Twitter, Inc.

Conversation

hmmmm

The following media includes potentially sensitive content. Change settings

View

7:17 PM · Aug 10, 2016

Replying to

I didn't vote, but I would have if 'about average' was an option.

Replying to

krugur effctu

Replying to

The wise man knows that he knows nothing

Replying to

conclusion: Your follower are more intelligent than the average twitter follower.

Silver (she/they)

Replying to

I vote "intelligence is a social construct"

1

Replying to

Just run with it. That way lies madness.

Replying to

if the results were reversed would it be any less "hmmmm" inducing?

Claudius (claudius@imd.social)

Replying to

well, those 22% must be _really_ dumb,then...