body { -ms-overflow-style: scrollbar; overflow-y: scroll; overscroll-behavior-y: none; } .errorContainer { background-color: #FFF; color: #0F1419; max-width: 600px; margin: 0 auto; padding: 10%; font-family: Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; } .errorButton { margin: 3em 0; } .errorButton a { background: #1DA1F2; border-radius: 2.5em; color: white; padding: 1em 2em; text-decoration: none; } .errorButton a:hover, .errorButton a:focus { background: rgb(26, 145, 218); } .errorFooter { color: #657786; font-size: 80%; line-height: 1.5; padding: 1em 0; } .errorFooter a, .errorFooter a:visited { color: #657786; text-decoration: none; padding-right: 1em; } .errorFooter a:hover, .errorFooter a:active { text-decoration: underline; } #placeholder, #react-root { display: none !important; } body { background-color: #FFF !important; }

JavaScript is not available.

We’ve detected that JavaScript is disabled in this browser. Please enable JavaScript or switch to a supported browser to continue using twitter.com. You can see a list of supported browsers in our Help Center.

Terms of Service Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Imprint Ads info © 2023 Twitter, Inc.

Conversation

Do you believe generalizations, as long as not statistically wrong (e.g, "Rich people love paying taxes!") are more:

helpful
42.2%
hurtful
57.8%

405 votesFinal results

5:47 PM · Jul 24, 2016

Replying to

just misleading

@BlanketBurrito4

Replying to

people forget that you use generalisations for everyting, eg: gas station prices are more expensive, all pizza is delicious etc

1

1

Replying to

I wonder how many people will limit their thought process to groups of people because of the way you worded the question?

1

Replying to

that is a statistically wrong statement

1

1

Replying to

neither.

Replying to

factual, as opposed to "political, rhetorical, psychologically biased, etc"

Replying to

all generalizations are false...................Including this one.