So my twitter apparently believes that the more inconvenient it is to rescue a child, the less morally obligated you are to do it
Conversation
But 3 feet is different? How far must someone be away before it becomes ok to not save them
1
Show replies
Replying to
yeah... i guess moral obligation depends on distance in this case. 3 feet away vs 3 hours away makes a big difference.
if the question was simplier, would i try to save a child 3 feet away from me without obligation or moral? i would
Replying to
Morality is largely subjective, so one's moral obligations are also subjective and likely weighed against inconvenience / cost.
Replying to
This all depends on if I was the only one aware of the predicament. Surely someone closer then 3 hours away could save them 1st.
