duh. Im more consistent. Fuck morals.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
yeah... i guess moral obligation depends on distance in this case. 3 feet away vs 3 hours away makes a big difference.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But 3 feet is different? How far must someone be away before it becomes ok to not save them
-
i answered no on saving child at any distance, maybe a specific child i would save but not any one
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
if the question was simplier, would i try to save a child 3 feet away from me without obligation or moral? i would
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
don't blame me; i voted 'no' on the 3 feet one.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Morality is largely subjective, so one's moral obligations are also subjective and likely weighed against inconvenience / cost.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This all depends on if I was the only one aware of the predicament. Surely someone closer then 3 hours away could save them 1st.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.