body { -ms-overflow-style: scrollbar; overflow-y: scroll; overscroll-behavior-y: none; } .errorContainer { background-color: #FFF; color: #0F1419; max-width: 600px; margin: 0 auto; padding: 10%; font-family: Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; } .errorButton { margin: 3em 0; } .errorButton a { background: #1DA1F2; border-radius: 2.5em; color: white; padding: 1em 2em; text-decoration: none; } .errorButton a:hover, .errorButton a:focus { background: rgb(26, 145, 218); } .errorFooter { color: #657786; font-size: 80%; line-height: 1.5; padding: 1em 0; } .errorFooter a, .errorFooter a:visited { color: #657786; text-decoration: none; padding-right: 1em; } .errorFooter a:hover, .errorFooter a:active { text-decoration: underline; } #placeholder, #react-root { display: none !important; } body { background-color: #FFF !important; }

JavaScript is not available.

We’ve detected that JavaScript is disabled in this browser. Please enable JavaScript or switch to a supported browser to continue using twitter.com. You can see a list of supported browsers in our Help Center.

Terms of Service Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Imprint Ads info © 2023 Twitter, Inc.

Conversation

anita sarkeesian is:

Translate Tweet

Terrible
36.9%
Ignorant
32.6%
Necessary
22%
A hero
8.5%

236 votesFinal results

2:30 PM · May 29, 2016

Replying to

I had to google her but what's her take on sex workers?

Replying to

my options on her are my own, but she is useful in showing the hate and cyber bullying that people spew.

Replying to

Cancer.

#ProtectTransKids

Replying to

I object to the choices. She's OK, not as important or as terrible as her detractors would claim. On balance I vote necessary.

Replying to

@CharlieDarkDude

and

I think this might be the first time ever that Wikipedia has let me down. ;_;

1

Replying to

A really bad representative for feminism

@KarlCarter2015

Replying to

who?