What are the theories for why (even nonbrutal) rape is treated as an atrocity while nonsexual, horrifically violent assault, isn't?
Conversation
Replying to
I would think both are atrocities. I'm curious as to your use of "non", you're defining it by what it isn't? Why?
1
Replying to
Part of it has to do with how're we're socialized and the other part has to do with psychology. Love to talk w/ you about it.
1
Replying to
rape is a lot more invasive than non-sexual assault. You shouldn't do either, but rape is more traumatic psychologically.
1
2
Replying to
Because if you get violently assaulted as a guy, people USUALLY won't say it's your fault and you were asking for it
Replying to
The whole idea of rapists being ostracized in prison while murderers are respected never made sense to me. Both r scum.
Replying to
Obvious theory: that's not true. Violent assault is treated as an atrocity and rape isn't, so all the controversy's about rape.
1
Replying to
If a woman claims to be raped her name will not be reported by major media.Her accused rapist will have all of his info reported
Replying to
If a woman is beaten or killed all of her info and person who assaulted her will be reported by major media.
