I don't understand the 50 shades hate. It's erotica. Who ever has high standards for erotica? The purpose is to get you wet.
Conversation
Replying to
it's not erotica of its not consensual. 50 shades is abuse and. It consensual kink. It gives true BDSM a bad name
1
2
Replying to
Yeah like Kate said, I can't get off to erotica unless the storyline is explicitly nonconsensual.
1
1
Show replies
that's fine but it shouldn't be the first true representation of BDSM in mainstream film.
2
1
Replying to
"shouldn't"? According to who? It's a film designed to make people wet, not be educational.
1
Show replies
IRL abusive relationships are awful. Fantasy anything for the purposes of arousal is ok.
1
1
Show replies
@SinCity_M But 50 shades has no obligation to be that film. It never promised to be. We expect things from it just because it's popular.
2
Replying to
tolerate typos and bad proofreading? Ok. This is just bad.
"Finally, my medulla oblongata recalls its purpose, I breathe."
Replying to
As I understand it, you look at it as a blending of fantasy and reality, and how it presents a lifestyle to the public.
Replying to
So like, if people just wanna get turned on by the fantasy, that's fine. But when it's unclear that it's completely unrealistic+
Replying to
And might be presented as something that IS realistic and something that people are doing in this manner, people get upset.