Conversation

humanity isn't even a little prepared for AI. we're krill unable to comprehend the whale shaped shadow behind us. caterpillar about to get completely dissolved in a cocoon. the ocean about to evolve cyanobacteria. we're all about to become either dead or unrecognizable.

176

107

964

Replying to

I see software that basically denoises datasets into what we humans pass as reasonably coherent patterns due to their familiarity to patterns we trained it on. So what manifestation of ai in your opinion is so godlike currently?

Aella

@Aella_Girl

Replying to

@MiranteDaniel

We're fundamentally the same thing as AI, except it takes 18 years to roll the dice on getting another one of us, and we have almost no self modification capacity

7:13 AM · Jan 29, 2023

10.6K

Views

Retweet

Quote Tweets

Likes

Replying to

and

We’re subjects who experience the world and our internal states. AI isn’t a subject, doesn’t experience anything, and is just objective machine processing. Doesn’t that make us fundamentally different from AI?

Replying to

and

I don't think internal states is really the right question here

Show replies

Replying to

and

Tell me you don't understand AI without telling me you don't understand AI

Replying to

and

No, this is the correct view. She's not saying we are ChatGPT, she's saying we are the same as AI. If you give ChatGPT global memory, access to external information, and the ability to sleep every night in order to train on new data that it has learned throughout the day...

Show replies

Replying to

and

Wanted to like this, but there are exactly 42 likes, so I'll just comment instead.

Replying to

and

Slow motion birth of a superior entity. Its infinite power compels humanity to create it.

Replying to

and

why should we feel language models exactly? These things don't have will or desire and they are not aware that they actually exist. ChatGPT will tell you so if you ask.

Replying to

and

Our neural structures adapts and changes all the time, even more si when young. We have very limited control of that change but it does change. Just try learning the Piano for 2 years, you’ll see what that change it capable of

Replying to

I don't think we are fundamentally the same. That's quite a predicate you're working off there. Question axioms 🐾

Replying to

and

All that matters for this to be true, and I do mean ALL.. is that people are going to surrender to the infallibility of the output of AI, LONG before it is infallible.