Conversation

Replying to
I guess an argument can be made that I've survived every day so far, but yep — it is a pretty weird use of the term. A caveat would be something damaging enough (physically or mentally) that it would alter someone's outlook on life, but I guess those are also life-threatening.
2
18
Show replies
Replying to
hard disagree. it’s much healthier to refer to yourself as a survivor of, let’s say, abuse than to coin yourself as a victim and remain in the down-trodden mentality. in reverse, “survivor” fosters healing and a growth mindset.
6
43
Replying to and
I don't think of myself as a victim of abuse or survivor of abuse. I'm someone who experienced abuse when I was young, sure, but it's far past being a salient or defining feature of my experience of the world today. Hopefully, with time and healing these things fade.
3
8
Show replies
Replying to
Yeah. It's a little overused & blanketing. On one hand, while the experience itself was not life-threatening, the psyche can twist in a way that begins to go against survival instincts, leading to self-destruction. OTOH, chill on self-victimization...
Quote Tweet
1/He demonstrated his unrealistic worldview & crippling lack of communication skills through reliance on "officialese" (Amtssprache) & the euphemistic Sprachregelung (convention of speech) that made implementation of Hitler's policies "somehow palatable." en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eichmann_
Show this thread
Embedded video
5:39
15.4K views
2
Replying to
It’s trendy these days to be a victim, so it’s trendy to be a ‘survivor’ of some thing that made you a ‘victim’. Modern times
2
3
Replying to
Like what? Usually when people call themselves survivors it’s of diseases, domestic abuse, trafficking, rape, pedophilia.. While those aren’t always “life-threatening,” the trauma often causes suicidality which is life-threatening. Being a survivor of suicidality is legitimate.
1
10