Conversation

fully 50% of my drive to get more social media followers is bigger sample size on surveys. been posting nudes again regularly so i can more easily reach statistical significance

920

@Amanda_Jay8

Dec 21, 2022

Replying to

@Aella_Girl

You will never reach statistical significance with a biased sample

Replying to

and

Almost all samples and polls are biased in some way. That doesn’t mean that the results aren’t useful and the findings not statistically significant. You just have to be careful about generalizing to the total population.

Replying to

and

Yep, she posted about this

aella.substack.com

You don't need a perfectly random sample for useful data, jfc

Replying to

and

Ok sure I'll take the L, now can you explain to me how increasing an already huge sample size will make "reaching statistical significance" easier?

Replying to

and

see point d in the article

3:10 AM · Dec 22, 2022

644

Views

Replying to

and

I'm officially embarrassed for you ♥️

Replying to

I agree with you that significance is a flawed concept, but it assumes a random process of data generation. See my previous tweet. (I am not embarrassed for you, but I don't think you're using this term correctly, and your Substack post doesn't address this criticism.)