Conversation

Replying to and
Since I have a tremor disorder and not enough characters to explain on Twitter, here’s an article that easily explains you don’t just do a survey on social media and call it a day.:
1
well, while i agree with you in theory, i think i have a few issues with you saying all this. (1) the bins have an n=40, but according to the survey the overall n=283. second, SWer N is difficult to determine so an appropriate SWer n is also then difficult to determine 1/?
1
1
there are important methodological issues happening here (e.g., selection bias and undercoverage), but imo the author isn’t claiming causality or generalizability (tho i could be wrong); rather it seems like they’re explaining associations which is different than causality 2/?
2
1
but a lot of these problems could be solved with a more robust demographics section to calculate appropriate weights. but again, the author seems more concerned with something like “there is a trend for SWers on twitter” rather than “this is a causal factor in outcomes”
1
1
you're not, though? you're acting like i'm making claims far beyond what i actually am. i'm sharing results from a survey i did, i'm not saying this is perfectly representative of all escorts. also i did estimate of total escort # here
2
2
why do people just *assume* my data came from the worst possible places instead of asking me? I have over a million followers across six different platforms and recruited participants from all of them. and I collected data on where my respondents advertised so i can see!
1
1