Conversation

Replying to
and even then it gets to the right answer via wrong reasoning. Do we need to assume a probability (0.1) of him being both a librarian and a fisher, after we established that these are probably not correlated? can't we just calculated it as 0.8 * 0.2? Or am I bad at probabilities?
1
Replying to
It's definitely cool, but it's not "using" anything. It's a language model. The prompt simply produces that output. There is no inherrent "understanding" of the underlying process.
1
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Show