Conversation

Sounds like the men you’ve “guided” are more “hobbyist” types, where it’s all about attraction/getting off. A lot of us want clients who value more than just our beauty and they often blossom ongoing client relationships w/ a much higher ROI than catering to the hobbyist type:)
Quote Tweet
imo lots of escort marketing misses the mark, because it exemplifies what *women* think a highly desirable woman is - romantic, ethereal, alluring. I've guided a few men to escort directories to quietly watch how they navigate what they click on and where their attention goes 1/
Show this thread
15
177
Replying to
hobbyists couldn't afford my rates lol but imo great clients are not uniquely selected for by romantic feminine marketing! They're affected by authentic marketing, which is orthogonal to the distinction i was making in my original post
Replying to
there are hobbyists who pay high fees—they’re still hobbyists 🤷🏽‍♀️ and like I said in my QRT, my marketing is authentic; what clients see is what they get & what I expect. I just don’t cater to hobbyists, and even so tons of them still book me. So there’s 2 ways your logic fails.
2
Replying to and
I feel like good marketing is about authenticity like you said in these two ways: authenticity in the message and the delivery. What makes the marketing authentic is tied to the identity of person doing the marketing. I feel like that's what people are trying to tell you.
1