No.
Conversation
Replying to
Moser's study was designed to misrepresent what autogynephilia is. I don't think that's the case for Aella's survey, although the "validity" of what is being measured is misleading. There is a lot of data here and I would love to see you critique the findings in more detail.
1
Replying to
No it's not. She asked about things in this survey (such as sexual interests/aversions of FtMs vs. non trans identified females) that none of you sexologists have touched. If you are a better researcher than she is, then why wont you research this? Is female sexuality irrelevant?
1
Replying to
You apparently have no idea what I’ve done. And I’m just saying her current study is dumb.
2
Replying to
If you think I have missed something than please send me a pdf and I will read it, if I haven't already (which would be a surprise).
1
Replying to
Thank you. I have already read this though. I don't think females are autogynephilic in the same sense that males are. Some people imagine that if they were this would make AGP males the same as females, but that overlooks the far more important fact that they are male!..
3
I do suspect this is true; my guess is the thing that underlies female genderbending is somehow different in a substantial way than the thing that underlies male genderbending; i think this is alluded to with the differing correlations among the 'existing as opposite sex' scores
If you are ever interested in collaborating to research female sexual interest in genderbending, and more narrowly the role played by autoandrophilia in female gender dysphoria, let me know.
2
In the ancestral environment, females' power depended more on getting access to males' power. It seems plausible that females had to put themselves more into the shoes of males - in all kinds of ways - to get males to do what they wanted. Males didn't have to do the same.