Conversation

this seems fine to me? It's the teacher's body, let them do what they want with it. i kinda feel like you being weirded out is your business.
Quote Tweet
BREAKING: Oakville Trafalgar High School has come out in defense of a male teacher who has been wearing a massive prosthetic bust, complete with protruding nipples, to class. In an email sent to parents, the school says "gender identity" is protected. reduxx.info/ontario-high-s
513
272
Replying to
Insofar as this person has an autogynephilic kink, they're (arguably) imposing their kink on minors, without their full, informed consent, when they're paid by taxpayers to care for their kids. Which seems wrong, & not consistent with consent norms in BDSM subculture.
9
1,092
Replying to
It's a tricky issue, & there's a lot of 'moral dumbfounding' at work here. Another example would be, what if a teacher wore a big silicone 'packer' that made it look like that had an enormous penis when teaching? Would it matter whether they were bio male or FTM trans?
5
102
Replying to and
What if the teacher didn't claim to be a woman, but taught stark naked with an erection? I am not asking rhetorically - I'm wondering if there is a line you would draw, and if so, where and on what basis.
Replying to and
To me this is a case where lots of people would object to a similarly distracting thing that wasn't at all sexual--for example, if the teacher wore a gigantic prosthetic nose or a wig that dragged behind them like the train of a wedding dress.
7
77
Show replies