Conversation

Aella
@Aella_Girl
to clarify this, I don't feel super interested in like... who's friends with who, or moving where, or how was that event you went to, or general life details. I'm much more interested in dissecting the system of how someone's thoughts and emotional landscape works, like a puzzle.
Quote Tweet
Aella
@Aella_Girl
i am pretty down with a lot of the stereotypical ways men can't 'satisfy' women; not as emotionally in tune, wants higher novelty in mate choice, bad at picking up underwear or whatever. I've come to terms with all that, celebrate differences! except for one thing
Show this thread
3
Retweets
225
Likes
FoxForFox
@VoxForFox
Replying to
@Aella_Girl
Does it correlates with lack of curiosity in sexual activity too? I mean like lack of time spending figuring out how your partner enjoy something the most? (during petting for example)
Mars
@marknadal
Replying to
@Aella_Girl
Does the set of all sets contain itself? | Are you an optimist?
  • Yes | Yes
    58.3%
  • Yes | No
    16.7%
  • No | Yes
    12.5%
  • No | No
    12.5%
48 votesFinal results
CEB
@chrisbrown1213
Replying to
@Aella_Girl
With love having been the primary motivator for so many lifelong fears and desires…studying the mind of a person I am in love with would be like studying the mind of someone responsible for creating my mind. It would be endlessly fascinating.
5
Anomalous
@0137Anomalous
Replying to
@Aella_Girl
I'm generally the same. I take a strong interest in the 'cognitive structure' of a partner. I forget the author who wrote something like "True understanding is more intimate than sex" I probably butchered the quote but it's only gotten more accurate the older I get
5
J
@JerryFl07565225
Replying to
@Aella_Girl
I'm with you but, most (all genders included) like to stay on the surface. "Real" conversations tend to be unsettling. If everyone knew how or what I thought, I'd probably be ostracized.