Conversation

i am pretty down with a lot of the stereotypical ways men can't 'satisfy' women; not as emotionally in tune, wants higher novelty in mate choice, bad at picking up underwear or whatever. I've come to terms with all that, celebrate differences! except for one thing
69
406
which is lower curiosity, or something related? I was talking to some of my friends, complaining how hard it was to find a partner who seemed actively, genuinely curious about me, and realized this seems to be a really gendered thing.
25
303
like, when im in relationships i love asking careful questions, cause im super curious about my partner, i want to know about them, how their mind works, how they feel about the world. but its rare to find someone who wants to do it to me
14
339
and i think this is probably a gendered thing and it makes me feel sad. i can accept a dude who never cries or wants to bang a new woman every week, but it feels really painful to just 'accept' low curiosity from a man. it feels like not being loved
20
381
Replying to
I had to work a lot to have innate interest in people and I’m still only okay at it, whereas my brain was like insanely interested by default by say physics, economics, ai, etc
3
19
Replying to
when i imagine the person-things interest gender split as "men don't like talkign about social drama or who went to the grocery store when" then im like that makes sense, but when i imagine "men dont like dissecting the system of a person's mind" i get angry
3
23
Replying to
so for me specifically it's like, if they're down to actually whiteboard and diagram out all their different parts and how they're interacting and what algorithms they've reverse-engeineered that they're running, i'm extremely down and excited by that, but ..
2
15
Replying to
that seems cool! that seems in line with what i would love. but i need someone to *ask me* to start learning about the different parts, and help me diagram it out, and express actual interest in that. if youre that kinda person then that seems cool
3
10