what are the metrics for calculating who the 'top 0.1% of skilled programmers' are? how does one even measure such a thing? it sounds like a fool's errand with so much variance within the profession
if GMVH then that's probably true, but how actually relevant is that to your life? I'm not sure if i'm in the top 50% of skilled programmers, and that's still sufficient to get a lot of shit that I want done, done
Do you think you're in the top .1% of female programmers now? Why would being born male put you in that position otherwise? I get it though I've had 'if I can't be amazing what's the point?' type thoughts in the past about stuff.
ironically, I think you would actually benefit most from masculine socialization in this instance. the dude way is telling you to suck it up and put in more effort
But those are just outliers on the normal distribution. Chances to belong to the top .1% of anything don't drastically increase because you belong to a certain sex; you're far more likely to be placed somewhere in the middle regardless of your sex.
Even if true, it doesn’t match the (joke?) fantasy you gave. The fantasy would be “what if I was a boy with very rare programming ability?” Not “what if I were a boy, then I’d have very rare programming ability”
but currently you’re just trying to go from bottom percentile programmer to mediocre programmer—your problem isn’t that you’re a girl it’s that you’re a beginner