I feel compulsively drawn to picking apart inconsistencies in neargroup worldviews. I think most trans discourse is glaringly inconsistent, and I really want to talk publicly about how it makes no sense, but I'm afraid this will be interpreted as me not supporting transitioning.
Conversation
Replying to
I support the end case and all the vital bits, like i think my final ideal of what is good aligns probably 90% with what a lot of trans activists value, but the entire philosophy they use to get there feels so poorly constructed to me and I have very little respect for it.
36
7
358
Replying to
Why do you think your opinions on this particular subject are worth sharing? Sincere question
22
2
11
Show replies
At some level - w no RT and no hate - everyone knows the core claim here is straight gibberish.
4
2
158
Show replies
Replying to
You already went this far, so you might as well just say what you want to say haha. Most people don't know what they're talking about so its easy to find the bad takes, but there are some good ones out there if you look hard enough.
10
Replying to
It does seem like a lot of people have inconsistent takes on it. Though maybe its also about balancing the normalization of transitioning. Sometimes the more "consistent" views are more radical and difficult for "normal" ppl to accept- ie, more difficult for political acceptance.
3
6
Replying to
Aella you simply are not allowed to do this. This is like rule #2 of being in the internet.
4
Replying to
You will be labeled as bigot if you question the nonsense. I also feel so much respect for trans people, but not so much for the pseudoscience and pseudopolitics around this.
8