Conversation

Twitter polls are no better than noise, they said. Concluding anything based off twitter polls is laughable and meaningless, they said. Real research is the kind that gets published in academic journals, they said. (look at that stable 2.2%!)
Image
Image
18
238
Show replies
Replying to
It’s great that the poll numbers were stable but that really doesn’t address the core concern: your sample of followers is likely non-representative in an unknown way. So we don’t really know how to interpret these results. Definitely fun though!
1
3
Show replies
Replying to
people dismiss them because they're too lazy themselves to learn how to write a good twitter poll which is a complex skill that's cultivated with practice, and get offended when you give them any advice on pollcraft
9
Replying to
if u really look into academic polling methods, u'll see your polls are just as good or better than most of the garbage that gets published.
2