Conversation

Replying to
If free will doesn’t exist, there’s no such thing as “consent” for anyone of any age. The difference in the experienced psychology of choice, as between children and adults (if there IS any difference), would be irrelevant.
2
3
Replying to
If the answer is no, and they have sex anyway, are you intending to throw both in jail for statutory rape? The word "consent" has weird legal connotations. I would tend to say "no", but putting both in jail seems like a bad outcome.
2
10
Replying to
Most likely no. And neither can the other child, because both are too young to grasp the full risks of it. If there is no coercion involved, then both are not at fault - from a moral perspective it's not a good thing, but also not bad.
3
16
Replying to
Not sure how 'can' is to be interpreted here. There is likely at least one child at some point in history that was able to meaningfully consent, but many cannot.
3
Replying to
There are a lot of different 13-year olds. Is the question about existence or majority?. Are there 13yo who can do it, or can the majority of 13yo do it? First one is clearly yes. Second one idk, but I am inclined to also say yes.
1
2
Replying to
What does "meaningfully consent" mean? Should we prosecute one (or both) of these children for statutory rape? No. Was this a good idea? Will they get emotionally screwed up? I've no idea, and for obvious reasons it's hard to do a study.
2
3