A company figures out how to genetically engineer fetuses to ensure they will not be gay. This has no side effects, and they end up as normal adults. This is:
Conversation
Replying to
The problem isn't that they cant be gay, it's that the company has the ability to do it, it could've been for marketing and they could have limited themselves & do (and have probably done) crazier unethical things (failed test subjects nobody knows about that grew, etc)
5
Replying to
Responses greatly appreciated
Quote Tweet
The Second amendment #2AShallNotBeInfringed … Roe v. Wade #RoeVWadeprotest .. How do people who identify strongly with one issue really feel about the other? Nobody is asking this question, so I am. Help me get some traction on this #RETWEEET
Show this poll
1
1
Replying to
Despite gay people removing themselves from the gene pool, there proportion seems to remain relatively stable across human history. This tells me that gayness is an evolutionary trait inflicted on a small number of the population to the benefit of the overall tribe.
3
1
Replying to
It’s pretty unclear what “this” is.
Is it “is it fine for them to know how to do this?” or “is it fine for them to do this?” ?
2
14
Replying to
Genetic modification of humans should be limited to eliminating genetic diseases.
5
15
Replying to
Genetically engineering is not ok regardless of trait unless it’s eliminating a disability/disorder/disease.
1