body { -ms-overflow-style: scrollbar; overflow-y: scroll; overscroll-behavior-y: none; } .errorContainer { background-color: #FFF; color: #0F1419; max-width: 600px; margin: 0 auto; padding: 10%; font-family: Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; } .errorButton { margin: 3em 0; } .errorButton a { background: #1DA1F2; border-radius: 2.5em; color: white; padding: 1em 2em; text-decoration: none; } .errorButton a:hover, .errorButton a:focus { background: rgb(26, 145, 218); } .errorFooter { color: #657786; font-size: 80%; line-height: 1.5; padding: 1em 0; } .errorFooter a, .errorFooter a:visited { color: #657786; text-decoration: none; padding-right: 1em; } .errorFooter a:hover, .errorFooter a:active { text-decoration: underline; } #placeholder, #react-root { display: none !important; } body { background-color: #FFF !important; }

JavaScript is not available.

We’ve detected that JavaScript is disabled in this browser. Please enable JavaScript or switch to a supported browser to continue using twitter.com. You can see a list of supported browsers in our Help Center.

Terms of Service Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Imprint Ads info © 2023 Twitter, Inc.

Conversation

There's a trope that white women fuck dogs, so I asked 5k women their ethnicity, and if they were sexually aroused by dogs. Here's the data (if ppl said they were into it = 1 point; if marked as fav out of similar options = 2; for reference, interest in 'spanking' scored 0.7)

55

50

313

The averaged responses from each category: White women (n=3565): 0.16 Hispanic/latino (n=446): 0.13 East Asian (n=262): 0.1 Asian (other) (n=386): 0.12 Black (African American) (n=137): 0.12 Black (other) (n=67): 0.05 Native American (n=26): 0.08 Pacific Islander (n=24): 0.54

10

7

133

So it looks like white women are slightly more interested in dog-specific bestiality, but not significantly; the white-ethnicity and dog-interest correlation was r=0.03 Pacific Islander women seem most sexually interested in dogs, but the sample size for this category was low

6:03 PM · Jul 6, 2022

Replying to

(general disclaimer there's a chance I made an error looking into this data, as I'm using python and I'm new to it. I did spot-check tho!)

7

3

110

Cpt. Dr. █̶̳̘͛̄̃͒̄̃͜█̴͇̱̅͒̅█̵̻̣̝͒̈̄̈͝͝█̴̞̜̻̝͍̂̽͜█̷

Replying to

I'd chalk it up to Lizardman's constant.

Replying to

Lol

Nate Hattersley

Replying to

p values on the correlation coefficients would help quantify the small sample effect of Pacific Islanders. scipy.stats.pearsonr returns it!

3

Replying to

should have asked much they like dogs as well. different cultures have different relationships with dogs

ElectricPowerHouse

Replying to

Can you talk about these findings on your show?

@EricMorganCoach

Replying to

Ive heard this for horses, not dogs. But also...this seems like the thing where people wouldn't give honest answers, even anonymously

1

@TheNeuropsyche

Replying to

How did you calculate a correlation coefficient if white-ethnicity is nominal-level data?

1

Replying to

“Pacific Islanders” could literally mean a few random Filipinos laughing at the question and fucking with you.

4