I'm not really familiar with philosophy, so I don't know what term describes my view on morality. But to describe it, it's something like, all moral claims can be broken down into non-moral claims; moral language/concepts are 'shorthand' 1/
39
9
139
Conversation
Replying to
Your answer to the question “describe your morality” is “morality isn’t real”? I don’t think that’s an answer. If you see a framework as incoherent, reject it, sure. But try to replace it with something that makes sense, and in the meantime your answer can be “I don’t have one”?
3
5
Replying to
?? the whole christian framework for explaining how god and jesus are the same thing is one i reject, and i'm not replacing it with another framework to explain god and jesus, im just like 'this is all bunk'
Replying to
So you don’t have one? That’s totally cool. Also your new framework (which you totally don’t need if you don’t want another one) doesn’t have to explain a religion. Do you believe morality is exclusively for explaining religion?
1
5
Here's how I read your intent and I'm curious how off I am: moral systems are inconsistent and sometimes yield results that don't seem sensible. So instead of embracing a doctrine with edge cases, we should have a case-by-case analysis of the consequences of a course of action.
2
3