body { -ms-overflow-style: scrollbar; overflow-y: scroll; overscroll-behavior-y: none; } .errorContainer { background-color: #FFF; color: #0F1419; max-width: 600px; margin: 0 auto; padding: 10%; font-family: Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; } .errorButton { margin: 3em 0; } .errorButton a { background: #1DA1F2; border-radius: 2.5em; color: white; padding: 1em 2em; text-decoration: none; } .errorButton a:hover, .errorButton a:focus { background: rgb(26, 145, 218); } .errorFooter { color: #657786; font-size: 80%; line-height: 1.5; padding: 1em 0; } .errorFooter a, .errorFooter a:visited { color: #657786; text-decoration: none; padding-right: 1em; } .errorFooter a:hover, .errorFooter a:active { text-decoration: underline; } #placeholder, #react-root { display: none !important; } body { background-color: #FFF !important; }

JavaScript is not available.

We’ve detected that JavaScript is disabled in this browser. Please enable JavaScript or switch to a supported browser to continue using twitter.com. You can see a list of supported browsers in our Help Center.

Terms of Service Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Imprint Ads info © 2023 Twitter, Inc.

Conversation

Do you consider yourself to be part of the rationalist community (a 'rationalist')?

Yes
21.7%
rat-adjacent (eg. postrat
17.5%
No, but am familiar w/ em
36.9%
No, and am not familiar
23.9%

3,399 votesFinal results

19

2

26

Replying to

Being rational is really cool, being “a rationalist” is kind of cringe ngl

3

18

Replying to

and

Same vibes as calling yourself “an intellectual”, even if you are, in fact, intellectual

1

11

Replying to

believe me none of the rationalists like the name. there've been some attempts to rename, but none of them have stuck

5:04 PM · Jun 27, 2022

The Dread Canary

Replying to

and

This might be my answer, I like the name, therefore I must not be one. 😆

2