body { -ms-overflow-style: scrollbar; overflow-y: scroll; overscroll-behavior-y: none; } .errorContainer { background-color: #FFF; color: #0F1419; max-width: 600px; margin: 0 auto; padding: 10%; font-family: Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; } .errorButton { margin: 3em 0; } .errorButton a { background: #1DA1F2; border-radius: 2.5em; color: white; padding: 1em 2em; text-decoration: none; } .errorButton a:hover, .errorButton a:focus { background: rgb(26, 145, 218); } .errorFooter { color: #657786; font-size: 80%; line-height: 1.5; padding: 1em 0; } .errorFooter a, .errorFooter a:visited { color: #657786; text-decoration: none; padding-right: 1em; } .errorFooter a:hover, .errorFooter a:active { text-decoration: underline; } #placeholder, #react-root { display: none !important; } body { background-color: #FFF !important; }

JavaScript is not available.

We’ve detected that JavaScript is disabled in this browser. Please enable JavaScript or switch to a supported browser to continue using twitter.com. You can see a list of supported browsers in our Help Center.

Terms of Service Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Imprint Ads info © 2023 Twitter, Inc.

Conversation

well looks like in biological males, ADHD is correlated with sexual interest in vore at .16, n=13k

28

10

222

@randomstring729

Replying to

so... not in any meaningful capacity checks out

1

6

@_SqueezeTheorem

Replying to

@randomstring729

and

No that's actually a pretty huge correlation. The bigger problem is external validity. Aella's followers are not the most representative bunch 😅

1

19

You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more

Replying to

and

@_SqueezeTheorem

It's not huge but still not meaningless!

6:43 PM · May 20, 2022

You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more

Replying to

and

@_SqueezeTheorem

This guideline doesn't seem applicable to the field I'm working with; the kinds of r values that are exciting change wildly depending on the type of thing you're researching!

1

1

Show replies

@TheNeuropsyche

Replying to

and

@_SqueezeTheorem

Correct. This means that one variable (ADHD) effect explains ~4% of the variance in the other variable (interest in vore). It is a small effect, but it's a good start and can lead to more questions!

1

1