Conversation

deleted that tweet that was getting ratio'd, not cause I take it back, but because it was generating a disproportionate amount of yelling at me. I'm planning on writing a much more in-depth and less ratio-able blog post about my reasoning on the topic! But to clarify:
543
536
My goal here is *reducing* the amount of child sexual abuse that happens. We might disagree on how to do this, but our end goal is the same. I do genuinely think that my strategy in the tweet has a good chance of reducing harm! I'm aligned with you on this.
165
424
Replying to
"the need for an innocent person to suffer/take on the suffering of others so that people can merge and become one bodily and spirit with innocence itself" is not something that can be solved with solely secular technology
1
3
Show replies
Show replies
Show replies
Replying to
The founding myth of modern libertarianism is that the temperance movement and Prohibition created black markets in which net societal alcohol consumption increased relative to the counterfactual.
1
Replying to
Reading these replies, it seems many people feel more positive emotions around punishing pedophiles than they do around protecting children. Your "best outcomes" are quite different from theirs
2
8
Replying to and
In other word, many of these people would experience more pleasure reading the headline, "STREETS LITTERED WITH THE CORPSES OF ALLEGED PEDOPHILES IN MASS LYNCHING," instead of, "RATE OF CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE DROPS TO ZERO IN 2022"
1
4
Show replies