Conversation

This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more

Why would someone pay a child abuser tons of cash if they can get the same thing depicting a child that *doesn't exist and doesn't suffer*, for free? It's like, would you outlaw 100% realistic lab-grown, *free* beef? You would, if your goal is to protect the real-beef industry.

235

171

276

Replying to

I would imagine it's not *just* the image that's arousing, it's the abuse itself that is. Kinda like avant garde art, part of the art is the method it was made.

Aella

@Aella_Girl

Replying to

@Beanbagging1

I actually don't think so; 1) child abusers tend to rationalize that the child likes it 2) lots of people who like depictions of abuse itself, also actively prefer it not 'totally real', but acted; CP watchers *don't have the option of not totally real*

4:40 PM · Apr 7, 2022

Replying to

and

The other problem is that if it is abuse they are attracted to, their targets wouldn't always be prepubescent children.

Replying to

and

The way you are saying this makes it sound as though you think loli content is CP, it isn't and there are entire threads going over how pedos don't like loli. They don't want artificial, as a matter of fact it seems to be something they fight. They want real children.

Replying to

and

You should just delete your tweet and back away, because you aren’t doing yourself any favors advocating in favor of child abuse

Replying to

and

1 is so wrong. 2, you are not getting that without crossing into what you are trying to prevent.

Replying to

and

They rationalize that the child likes it because it's a horrific act and they don't want to be responsible for it - they push the shame of it back onto the child. They get off on how horrific it is even if they will never admit it. So no, fake digitized horror will not work.