Conversation

This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more

Why would someone pay a child abuser tons of cash if they can get the same thing depicting a child that *doesn't exist and doesn't suffer*, for free? It's like, would you outlaw 100% realistic lab-grown, *free* beef? You would, if your goal is to protect the real-beef industry.

4:34 PM · Apr 7, 2022

Replying to

I would imagine it's not *just* the image that's arousing, it's the abuse itself that is. Kinda like avant garde art, part of the art is the method it was made.

Replying to

I actually don't think so; 1) child abusers tend to rationalize that the child likes it 2) lots of people who like depictions of abuse itself, also actively prefer it not 'totally real', but acted; CP watchers *don't have the option of not totally real*

Show replies

Legendary demi-hottie Li’l

Replying to

Replying to

Not completely wrong, but we should not bend to accommodate stupid behavior.

Replying to

Someone who is watching child sex abuse is not going to be satisfied with artificially generated child sex abuse. Why not just tweak AI to blast the heads off of people who are looking to sexually molest children?

GIF

read image description

ALT

This Tweet is from a suspended account. Learn more

Replying to

do you also think this about people who enjoy nonconsent porn?

Replying to

No one enjoys beef because of the real suffering of the cow. I sure hope the same pattern holds for other consumption, but unfortunately I can imagine it may not.

Replying to

I think one of the other problems that would pop up with the regulation or acceptance of generated pornography would be the oppositions theory or question of whether or not the porn in general would turn people into pedos or "awaken?" something in them.