Conversation

This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Replying to and
I mean if ur theory is "well there's a mystical agent that'd purposefully messing up all our testing" I uhhh I guess this is technically possible but like, are we really gonna favor that theory over "the theory we're testing might be wrong"?
22
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Replying to and
sure but like, is the mystical agent knowable? if they're not knowable, then they're as good as not existing; if they're knowable, then there's reason to know them; maybe they spoke to you in a dream or something. And boom, now we have interaction with reality. And we can test it
1
14
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Replying to and
people believing dumb things can be really, really harmful, and if someone believes a very dumb thing in one area it means there's something systemically wrong with their thinking that might end up being harmful when a situation comes up that matters
1
14
Was trying to put my finger on the problem with the idea magic has agency, and I think it's this. lesswrong.com/posts/X2AD2Lgt You can say it's not a claim, but it IS an implicit claim once you raise it. Like how religions say "something made the world, why not (my v specific thing)?"
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more