Can we run a study on it?
no, because if you don't believe in it won't give you results.
So can we run a study where we see if believers get different results than nonbelievers?
well no, the effects are personal and hard to predict and rely on individual interpretation.
It's a big red flag for your worldview if the entirety of it lies just beyond the border of empirical testing, it's like pointing to a ring of dirt just beyond where the mop reaches and going "yes, an organic discovery of a natural structure that has nothing to do with the mop"
If your theory has any impact on the real world at all, then it should be testable! it's in the domain of testability! It might be really hard to figure out a test, and the test might not be perfect, but it's possible. That which can be cleaned by the mop, should be.
And it might be really hard or dangerous to *carry out* the test. In principal you can test scientific theories of whatʼs inside a black hole, whatʼs beyond the cosmological event horizon, or quantum mechanics interpretation. In practice, not so much.
You could say that about bitcoin and lightning network. Just try getting the # of successful payments made per day .
Avg value of a successful payment.
Avg number of paths tried for each successful payment.
# of attempted payments that failed to go through. It's bullshit
EPR was “thought experiment” stated as quantum mechanics paradox by Einstein in 1935
It was FALLIBLE but not TESTABLE until Bell theorem in 1964 provided a theory for how the test could look like
Only in 1972, 1988, 1998, … we got more and more precise physical experiments 🤷🏻♂️
I agree with this for everything except normative questions (unless a very particular goal is already stipulated) and the hard problem of consciousness.