Conversation

so amazing when your magic/energy/occult theory just so happens to be perfectly shaped to avoid any empirical testing whatsoever
44
848
Can we run a study on it? no, because if you don't believe in it won't give you results. So can we run a study where we see if believers get different results than nonbelievers? well no, the effects are personal and hard to predict and rely on individual interpretation.
8
177
It's a big red flag for your worldview if the entirety of it lies just beyond the border of empirical testing, it's like pointing to a ring of dirt just beyond where the mop reaches and going "yes, an organic discovery of a natural structure that has nothing to do with the mop"
3
163
Replying to
And it might be really hard or dangerous to *carry out* the test. In principal you can test scientific theories of whatʼs inside a black hole, whatʼs beyond the cosmological event horizon, or quantum mechanics interpretation. In practice, not so much.
1
1
Replying to
You could say that about bitcoin and lightning network. Just try getting the # of successful payments made per day . Avg value of a successful payment. Avg number of paths tried for each successful payment. # of attempted payments that failed to go through. It's bullshit
Replying to
EPR was “thought experiment” stated as quantum mechanics paradox by Einstein in 1935 It was FALLIBLE but not TESTABLE until Bell theorem in 1964 provided a theory for how the test could look like Only in 1972, 1988, 1998, … we got more and more precise physical experiments 🤷🏻‍♂️
2