This article is great, not just cause it's well reasoned but because it's a good example of what it takes to actually directly evaluate a lot of claims in scientific literature.
Conversation
Stopped reading after this lie. “Dozens of teams published studies saying ivermectin definitely worked. Then most scientists concluded it didn’t.”
2
2
it's not untrue - he presents a contradiction between studies and scientists, and spends the rest of the post trying to figure out wtf is going on, why would scientists disagree with studies?
IVM helps against COVID, but only if you have worms. (Not a joke, maybe a month or so ago scientists figured out this was what was happening to skew studies in countries where worms are prevalent. Lots of reputable scientists on Twitter tweeted about it.)
1
4