Conversation

I unapologetically view people who literally believe the stars/planets can predict unrelated things on earth as uniquely bad at thinking (moreso than many other strange beliefs) But if you don't literally believe this, then astrology seems like it could be really cool. 1/
35
557
Replying to
when I was a child, I watched a documentary about the Bible code, where if you arrange all the letters in a Bible on a grid, you can find word clusters that predicted terrible events. they had several uncanny, convincing examples
1
24
Replying to and
turns out if you have a massive random generation of words, you can easily go through and pick out the ones that are significant. this even happens in science all the time, with p-hacking. get a ton of astrologers making a ton of predictions, totally unsurprised some are right
1
30
Replying to and
wouldn't be surprised if an astrologer or two predicted other upcoming events too. the question here isn't if they got big events right, (if you throw enough darts some will be right), but how many else you get wrong. What's your accuracy ratio?
2
16
Replying to
That's a nice way of framing the question, but it's also fallacious. Let's say accuracy is 1%. If that 1% success rate is based on a prediction detailed enough that it cannot be explained by mere chance, there's some undeniable predictive power in the technique.
4
3
Replying to
it's still a ratio! the Bible code had words in the shape of a rocket, the words were "challenger" and "catastrophe " and "stars" or whatever. super specific, super unlikely. If you have enough darts, it *can* be explained by random chance. there's an easy way to check tho
2
8
Replying to and
(and fwiw, I would expect a non astrologer to do a bit better than chance depending on what they're predicting, cause you can make predictions based on information in the world like the news or understanding human character)
1
1
Show replies
Show replies