Conversation

Wanna know if a pro-choice argument is effective at persuasion? Simply apply the Anti-Abortion Translator: replace "abortion" with "shooting babies in the head". If your pro choice argument suddenly sounds idiotic with the translator applied, then it's not gonna be persuasive.
Quote Tweet
In an interview with The Chronicle, VP Kamala Harris warned of grave consequences if the Supreme Court overturns Roe vs. Wade: “I don’t mean to sound alarmist, I mean this: Women will die." Read more: bit.ly/3EOQ0Sx
Show this thread
Image
25
109
Show replies
Replying to
I mean, I think that while belief is largely earnest, one can also discount the feelings of outgroup people and "don't care about women's rights" is in part pointing at something real there, even if it's not good for persuasion. I've found failures like that in my own beliefs.
1
4
Replying to
is it? I don't think "not caring about women's rights " rings particularly true at all in any meaningful way to me. maybe I'm not understanding your point here
1
6
Show replies
The 'women's bodies' framing has always infuriated me. I have actually discussed abortion with people who think that pro-lifers actually *want* to control women's bodies, as if that is the end in itself. They just hate women, or something. Ridiculous.
1
2
Not sure this passes your persuasion rule: ‘shooting babies in the head isn’t actually shooting babies in the head’ 😄 Kinda requires some initial lateral thinking which probs wouldn’t happen in such an argument
1
Show more replies