Conversation

Replying to
My caveat is that medically necessary abortions to save the life of the mother or if the baby is non-viable are legal up to the point the professionals involved deem it necessary
1
19
Replying to
People saying 9 months can’t be serious. I see no difference between that and waiting 9 months post-birth then killing the kid
2
12
Replying to
I'm with Peter Singer on infanticide (probably a lot more permissive, actually), so I don't feel inconsistent saying 9 months
1
9
Replying to
Only if the child's been disobedient. So it's actually not acceptable until AT LEAST 9 months, because how's a fetus gonna disobey? But after that for however long the parents are alive. This is lindy.
1
2
Replying to
Clarity: I'm assuming you mean only voluntary abortion. Clarity: I'm assuming you are strictly considering a personal case of voluntary abortion. If either assumption is wrong, my answer would also change. Also; I can never be pregnant, so... My view here is very stunted.
1
Replying to
Question doesn't really capture the gradient of reasons necessary to justify the abortion. I think, roughly: up to 3 months: no questions asked up to 6 months: needs specific justifications up to 9 months: probably only medical emergencies or significant disabilities/defects
1
4
Replying to
I always start from extremes – if you're at 9 months and you have a Savita Halappanavar situation, then how do you conclude the abortion is not morally okay? Circumstances matter more than the trimester.
1
14