Conversation

I think a lot of misconception around my sex work and audience comes from the fact I keep my SFW and NSFW worlds pretty separate; people see this twitter and associated links and assume *this* must be the audience I'm marketing to. But no; yall fucks are not my target consumer.
12
247
When I'm working regularly I heavily advertise in large-traffic areas that aren't selected for much really beyond "horny, porn-friendly men". They're not rationalists, or particularly nerdy, or libertarian or whatever, and my advertising is also not nerdy/libertarian or whatever
1
66
The kind of niche I advertise is "I am a down to earth, genuine, silly girl who doesn't take herself too seriously and is having fun with her life and is organically, constantly aroused." That's *way* more marketable to a broader audience.
3
92
When I do something like post a photo of me naked and spread legs with my vagina covered up with Godel, Escher, Bach, I'll maybe get like 3 very excited people who are going to make up like 0.2% of my income, and a bunch of ppl mad I'm cockblocking with a random book.
2
118
Plus, there's like what... 1k 'rationalists' worldwide or something? And I have 50% onlyfans churn *per month* and (when working regularly) flux around 3.2k subscribers. If rationalists were my consumers I would have exhausted them several times over a long time ago.
Replying to
Basically, if you go check out some high traffic, popular porny worlds, there's a good chance you'll eventually stumble across my face under a pithy, boner-inducing subtitle, sandwiched between other hundreds of other girls doing exactly the same thing as me
7
69
Replying to
OF doesn't give a ton of info, and it's extremely hard to manually track numbers that high. I mostly track things like "$ income per user per month" and can switch focus from trying to increase that vs increasing total users
Replying to
Not disputing the main point but surely 1K is an underestimate? ACX has “tens of thousands” of subscribers on substack. If you also figure 90% of users are lurkers LessWrong alone would be > 1K Don’t have hard numbers; 1K just seems way off to me based on intuition
1
2
Replying to
I didn't put a ton of thought into it, but I suspect the way I draw the line around 'rationalist' is much tighter than those numbers? Like, I give that name to ppl who have highish/regular engagement with the community
1
Show replies
Replying to
I've said it before and I'll say it again. I first found you on NSFW Reddit and then ran across this side of you. I keep forgetting now that you have a NSFW side that's your primary demographic you target. I wonder how many of your followers have a similar experience to mine.
1
1