this question brought to you by a friend helpfully suggesting I could go into programming as a backup job, and when I was like I don't know how to program he shrugged and was like "you have tits, they're desperate for anything with tits"
It seems plausible to me in the abstract, since the company talks the talk as far as DEI. But when I just consider the competence of the people we've actually ended up with, if anything the women might be slightly better than the men.
I strongly suspect yes and no. Meaning as a woman you have be twice as good to be seen as at parity with a man.
So if they feel pressure to hire a woman and think they have to lower standards, it means you only have to be 1.5X as good as a man to get the position.
I have heard reliably of the opposite effect in social work, where male social workers (at eg a government community mental health org) are given significant slack because leadership are so desperate to reduce the significant imbalance in female to male ratio.
I'm not sure it's intentional but I do think there are subconscious effects that take place when dudes in tech interview women. Expectations are lower so that generally skews the candidates that are hired.
I honestly can’t say, my company has hired 3 ppl since I’ve been here, and only 2 women applied compared to 300+ men. Neither of the women had any experience in what we needed, so they weren’t even considered.