JavaScript is not available.

It comes to light that a man in an elected position of high power raped a woman, though did not leave any other physical damage. This occurred thirty years ago. Would you consider this justification to call for his removal?

yes
89.1%
no
10.9%

1,248 votesFinal results

It comes to light that a man in an elected position of high power had a habit of groping women at dance clubs without their consent. This occurred 30 years ago. Would you consider this justification to call for his removal?

yes
37.3%
no
62.7%

1,205 votesFinal results

It comes to light that a man in an elected position of high power would drug women he asked over for dates and have sex with them without their knowledge. This occurred thirty years ago. Would you consider this justification to call for his removal?

yes
94.2%
no
5.8%

1,219 votesFinal results

It comes to light that a man in an elected position of high power would demand sex from his wife even when she didn't feel like it, and use emotional pressure, guilt and anger to persuade her. This occurred 30 yrs ago. Would yu consider this justification to call for his removal?

yes
27.8%
no
72.2%

1,670 votesFinal results

It comes to light that a man in an elected position of high power had sex with a 15 year old when he was 25. The 15 year old expressed eagerness and affection at the time. This occurred 30 yrs ago. Would yu consider this justification to call for his removal?

yes
41.2%
no
58.8%

1,714 votesFinal results

3:59 PM · Oct 9, 2021

Replying to

all of them: no. However it might be possible to prosecute him at a court and the prosecution result could be considered a proper reason for his removal depending on the local rules

Replying to

If the individual in power has kept doing it, absolutely. But people can change and 30 years is a long time.

Replying to

So much of how I would respond to this in a non-hypothetical scenario would depend on how this man responds when these things come to light. If they were behaviors of his past that he no longer does, then I think there should be room for second chances.

Replying to

I cannot answer any of these questions. Things that happened such a long ago, but never happened again, can be understood as statute-barred crime. So I wouldn't use this to take away someone from their position but I strongly doubt such thing could happen in most of the cases+

Replying to

Creepy but 15 is the legal age so no harm no foul.

Replying to

The current foreign minister of Denmark, Jeppe Kofod, had sex with a 15 year old intern in 2008 at a party conference. He was 34 at the time. The was no indication that it had been non-consentual. What's your judgement?

Lockdown Leisure Surveys

@polls4naija

Oct 10, 2021

Replying to